Showing posts with label character. Show all posts
Showing posts with label character. Show all posts

Sunday, 29 May 2016

Baking Cakes in Kigali by Gaile Parkin

Baking Cakes in Kigali by Gaile Parkin, 2009


This book has already been discussed and reviewed very extensively. It is a good read, convincingly written so that you can, or imagine you can, hear the Tanzanians and Rwandans speaking. It invites comparisons with Alexander McCall Smith’s Number One Ladies’ Detective Agency books, but is in a way much more serious, being set in post-genocide Kigali, with the multiple problems of “truth and justice”, Aids, malaria, orphaned street-children, and more.

A very telling aspect is how the various characters work together to rebuild Rwanda, at a very local and personal level.
Angel, the central figure, makes cakes to order. Each chapter is broadly built around a different cake, and the Cake Order Form, is one of the devices that unite the narrative into a whole. Angel also has a habit of polishing her glasses when she needs time to think; and making hot steaming mugs of sweet, spicy tea.

Parkin clearly draws very extensively on her own experience as an HIV-Aids counsellor in Kigali. What is conspicuous by its absence is any coherent notion of marriage or of the value of morality, continence, chastity or faithfulness. In the many incidents and discussions in the book which touch on weddings, marriage, and couples, there is no understanding of marriage and love as self-giving.

Certainly, Angel and Pius are faithfully married, and Angel refers with deep disapproval to the way a young woman called Linda dresses: “she had never seen a man look at Linda’s face; there were always other parts of her body that were asking more urgently to be observed.” Angel has good values, but does not reflect on them. She and Pius are Catholics, but they know that some Catholics, even nuns and priests, took part in the killing in 1994. “In Rwanda we’re simply Christians. I’m nervous of attending just one church here, of listening to just one priest. Because how can we know what is truly in that priest’s heart after so many showed that love and peace were only words in their mouths? So we attend a different church every second week; in between, we still attend our local Catholic church” (p.85).

At the very start of the book, Angel explains that when she and her husband got married (they are now grandparents), they were “pioneers” of contraception, and were careful to have only two children “so that we could afford to educate them well.” In the event, their children, having had children of their own, both lost their respective spouses and died before the start of the book, and Angel and her husband Pius are now starting all over again, bringing up their five grandchildren as their own children. The book does not point the moral, but it is actually a clear instance of how wrong-headed it is to contracept in order to have fewer children and hence more money.

A fairly important figure in the book is Jeanne d’Arc, who, having been orphaned and gang-raped during the genocide at the age of eleven, has been a prostitute for the past seven years in order to support herself, her two sisters, and a small boy they found abandoned. Angel is able to help Jeanne d’Arc in many different ways, finally putting her in touch with someone who can teach her to sew to be able to earn her living in a “safer” way. But, at the same time, she jokes with someone else about Jeanne d’Arc and her “business”. Perhaps she develops more compassion for Jeanne d’Arc in the course of the book.

Angel is able to help people in many ways in the course of her business. One often has the impression that the author had a list of themes she wanted to bring in, and worked through them – FGM, the mayibobo (street children), truthfulness to oneself and to others, Catholicism in Rwanda – chapter by chapter, through the book.

Overall it is a good read, ideal for provoking enjoyable discussions, which need to take each theme a lot deeper, with a lot more informed input, than the book itself is able to do.


Saturday, 5 December 2015

A Civil Contract by Georgette Heyer

A Civil Contract
 by Georgette Heyer, first published 1961

ACivilContract.jpg


All of Heyer’s Regency novels are simple escapism; this one is certainly that, but at the same time it gives readers a lot to think about. The theme could be stated quite simply as “Romantic love versus matrimonial love”.

Adam Deveril, an officer in Wellington’s army, in love with the beautiful and aristocratic Julia Oversley, has just succeeded to his father’s title of Viscount Lynton, and finds himself overwhelmed by his late father’s massive debts. In order to provide for his family and save Fontley, the family home, he marries the plebeian Jenny Chawleigh, daughter of a very wealthy banker. The book follows their first year of married life, up until the Battle of Waterloo (18th June 1815).

As in all Heyer’s books, the research is impeccable. From Adam’s colonel in the 52nd Regiment, to the exact day and time when the news of Waterloo reached London, from the behaviour of the Prince Regent to the fashions of the day in hats and dresses, the details are reliable and accurate.

The other very enjoyable feature that this book shares with other Heyer novels is the excellent writing. Not a single sentence jars; plenty of them are memorable. In A Civil Contract, perhaps more than in any of her other books, Heyer sets herself to give a very complete picture of the main characters in the book.

Adam is a gentleman through and through: his character traits are loyalty, chivalry, honesty, a sense of humour, and strength of character (he holds out in support of Wellington against surrounding friends who are Whigs). Fastidious, even finicky, reserved, he retires behind “an impenetrable barrier” when displeased or upset. He is deeply attached to Fontley; he loved soldiering, but turns out to be a farmer at heart. He loathes accepting gifts – either from Lord Oversley or from Mr Chawleigh.

He feels a romantic love for Julia; over the course of the book he develops a solid matrimonial love for Jenny. Having taken the decision to marry her, he commits himself fully to his marriage. Right from the start, as soon as they were married, “He did pity her, and forgot his own aching heart in the need to reassure her.” Later on, Julia suggests that since they both still love each other, they could have an affair: he rejects the suggestion out of a sense of honour, and loyalty and compassion for Jenny. We witness his feelings develop from his reply to Julia’s question “ ‘Can you be happy?’ A tiny headshake answered her”, through “he had grown to be fond of (Jenny) — so fond, he realized, that if, by the wave of a wand he could cause her to disappear he would not wave it”, to “ ‘I do love you, Jenny,’ he said gently. ‘Very much indeed — and I couldn’t do without you’.” By the end of the book he has recognised what Julia’s father, and Adam’s friend Brough, had seen clearly from the start: that Julia and he would have been very badly suited.

Jenny’s character includes common sense, generosity, and strength of character. She is well-educated and intelligent; loving, forthright, blunt, understanding, and perceptive. We discover that she has been secretly in love with Adam ever since she first met him the year before. She is “unromantic”; “a round, rosy face remarkable only for its determination”. “The trend of her mind was practical; she entered into married life in a business-like way; and almost immediately presented the appearance of a wife of several years’ standing. She quickly discovered, and never forgot, his particular fads”. She sets herself to make Adam comfortable by creating a welcoming, well-cared-for home and being constantly even-tempered and undemanding – though being pregnant, and unwell, causes a considerable change in her behaviour!

The other really remarkable character is Jenny’s father, Mr Chawleigh. He is rough, generous, vulgar, too old to learn, sharp, decent, honest, and bullying. He is ambitious for Jenny to enter high society, but not for himself: he recognises that he would only appear ridiculous among “the nobs”. Adam says to Jenny at one stage, “I think there can be no more generous persons alive than you and your father.” Adam and Mr Chawleigh have several clashes, but in the end, recognising how totally different they are, they each learn to respect and even admire the other. Adam reflects about Chawleigh that “He did not know that the things he said were unpardonable, or that self-control in moments of stress was incumbent on him. He had fought his way up in the world with no other weapons than his hard head and his ruthless will. He was brutal but generous, overbearing yet curiously humble, and he gave way to his emotions with the ease of a child.”


Sunday, 18 March 2012

Brixton Beach by R. Tearne, William Wilberforce by W Hague, and list

Feb-March 2012: Brixton Beach, Roma Tearne
We had a brilliant meeting about Brixton Beach, further enhanced by a delicious lamb curry with dhal, and illustrated books, old and new, about Sri Lanka, brought along by Ranmali.
The characterisation is excellent, the different people in the book are well-rounded, convincing characters whom you feel you have actually met. Most striking of all were the descriptions of the beauty of Sri Lanka / Ceylon, especially the sea, with the light and the colours. It didn't come as a surprise that the writer is also a painter. People also liked the descriptions of eating and the different types of food, which Ranmali was able to explain. She herself was very struck by seeing in print, for the first time, things that she had always heard - anay, "men!" for "mate", and others.
What some people really disliked about the book was the fact that it went from one tragedy to another. Every time you thought that there was a chance of things working out well for someone, wham! down came the next disaster. It wasn't at all clear why Tearne had called the different sections of the book 'Bel Canto', 'Paradiso', 'Inferno', 'Purgatorio', and 'Bel Canto' again, because the disasters occur throughout. It is not a book to read if you are feeling down. We discussed the question of the Buddhist world-view, which might have been the reason why the characters seemed to do nothing to try and improve a bad or hopeless situation, when they could have taken action to change things. The saddest part was Alice's marriage - both of them wanted it to succeed but they didn't work at it and the result was the marriage fell apart.
Bee was a general favourite, and his relationship with his wife Kamala was beautiful, based on real understanding, acceptance, and friendship, that had matured into love. Both of them were sincerely good people committed to each other, and to trying to help those in need. Janake too was a realistic, lovely, caring person. A striking thing was the representation of the Sea House as a living person, and then, after the assassinations, as a dead one.
Dec2011 -Feb 2012, William Wilberforce, William Hague
Although I don't think any of us had actually got to the end of the book, everyone had got a lot out of it. One bookclubber asked whether Hague could have reduced the background content by 10 – 20% and without losing the book's significance, so that the book could be read in a reasonable amount of time?
People were really enthused about WW's character: his honesty and integrity first of all, and his charm and gift for friendship, and his persistence: the fact that although he kept on getting beaten, he never even considered giving up. And he didn't do it out of natural stubbornness - he really suffered over the way that people who'd been captured as slaves were being treated, year after year, and was determined to help them. We wondered someone with his gifts, principles and determination could have the same effect on Britain today - what he did was comparable to campaigning for a reversal of the abortion laws now. Today's media, of course, is a factor that didn't exist in his time.
We also liked the bit about how he got swamped with letters and never actually got to the end of answering them because he wasn't business-like about it at all!
A really good thing about the book was that the author is someone who's been in Parliament all his life so he knows exactly what he's talking about - what it's like, what the issues are, how it worked then as well as now.
We needed the historical background filling in to understand the situation WW and Pitt were in - the ongoing state of war against France, the huge amounts being paid by Britain to other countries just to keep them in the fight, and the fear of a revolution in England like the French one.
We had a long and interesting digression about slavery today. Apparently the second largest "business" in the world today in terms of money is slavery and people-trafficking! And unlike the 18th century it is completely invisible. That would be another field for a "modern Wilberforce" to work on.
September-October, The Translator, Daoud Hari
July-September 2011, The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society, Mary Ann Schaffer and Annie Barrows; AND I Capture the Castle, Dodie Smith
June-July 2011, The House of Special Purpose, John Boyne
March-May 2011, To Kill a Mockingbird, Harper Lee
February- March 2011Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother, Amy Chua
February-March 2011 Silas Marner, George Eliot
Jan-Feb 2011 The Elegance of the Hedgehog, Muriel Barbery